Some thoughts on Paris

I've been trying to formulate some thoughts on the recent events in Paris and the following media tidal wave of articles, commentary, and editorials that have filled my social media news stream.  I've been encouraged by the fact that many people have been reaching beyond the mainstream news wire articles and have been pointing to the fact that the tragic events in Paris a few days ago were not the only tragic events in recent days.  What troubles me is that much of the discussion is centered on othering the people who have chosen to commit such violent acts as it does each time humans commit such large scale acts of violence against each other.

What I would like to say in the aftermath of all of these recent tragedies, specifically about the events involving human choices, is that the source of this violence is nothing we haven't seen before.  Recognizing that these people who have carried out these attacks as being people who do not represent any kind of majority is important but we have to be careful not to put them into a category that hints at them being unique, one-off extremists.  What must be in place for someone to commit an act of violence against another is a firm belief that what they're about to do is justified and okay.  To get there one must find a way to dehumanize the person or group of people they're preparing to commit the act of violence against.

Make no mistake, the ingredients of dehumanization and justification that motivated the decision making process for those who carried out the attacks in Paris, Beirut, and Baghdad (as well as for the many other violent acts committed that did not make the news) are also present in our own communities.  Those same ingredients are a factor when our government openly declares that an official inquiry into the missing and murdered indigenous women and girls is "not on their radar."  Those same ingredients are a factor when our media tries to place the blame on people of color who have been the victims of police brutality.  Those same ingredients are a factor when a judge openly blames a person who experienced a sexual assault that they're the one at fault.  Those same ingredients are a factor when our society as a whole believes that violence against women is "just the way things are."  Those same ingredients are a factor when People of Stature (professional athletes, actors, etc) are not held to the same level of accountability the rest of us would be.

Those same ingredients are a factor in every instance where one person is deciding to commit an act of violence against another.

The repetition is intentional because too often the link is not clear and putting theses kinds of violent acts into their own containers only contributes to a society that is tolerant of violence.  It is also important to be clear that this kind of dehumanization and justification does not just manifest out of thin air, it is the product of attitudes and beliefs that inform a persons world view as they come up and into their own sense of who they are.  These attitudes and beliefs are informed by a multitude of factors that include, but are not limited to, our peer groups, media, educational systems, the communities we're born into, our own degrees of privilege, our own willingness to self-educate, and so on.

My only ask here is that we all put energy into not only sending our positive thoughts to those who have recently experienced violence but into continuing that push to challenge and change the harmful attitudes and beliefs that contribute to the dehumanization of others.

Star Trek: Deep Space 9 - Far Beyond the Stars & Whitewashing

Captain Sisko: “What if this, all of this, is the illusion?”

Mr. Sisko: “That’s a scary thought.”

I’m not sure Star Trek: Deep Space 9 ever really got the praise it should have considering it’s poignant social commentary that seemed to crop up periodically throughout the series.  This time around I was watching the series having seen what went down in Ferguson as well as all the unfortunate events that dotted the timeline that was 2014.  When it came to the end of the episode and the scene with Sisko and his father I couldn’t help but cry-laugh at the irony of the scene.

The episode involves Sisko being given visions of 1950s America and he experiences the world as Benny Russell, an African-American speculative fiction writer who must be absent on picture days because it would hurt the publication he wrote for if the public found out that he was a person of color.  Taken as a standalone short film, critiqued in a vacuum, it is poignant all by itself, but when you consider the broader cultural context, current and historical contexts, and the nature of metafiction, this episode stands out as a fantastic piece of writing and storytelling.

The fact that Star Trek is fiction and they are lamenting the past or, rather, recognizing how terrifying it would be to live in a period of time when systemic racism was so prevalent really stands out because the time in which we live is not so far removed from the 1950s reality presented in this episode.  Direct, overt, acts of racism like not showing up for staff photo day or rewriting your main character (as Benny is asked told to do) are not as wide spread, but the systemic racism in pop culture is still just as prevalent as it was in 1950s, it only manifests in much more subtle ways.  Consider the outrage that came out of white critics when Quvenzhané Wallis was cast as Annie in the 2014 remake of the film of the same name or the conservative nail-biting that popped up around the holidays when an example of a black santa claus was brought up.  What about the panic that was induced in white people when a rumor made it through the internet that Idris Elba was being considered as the next actor to play James Bond.

Meanwhile, Exodus: Gods and Kings is cast with principle characters all being Caucasian and the director of said film fervently defending his choice because he felt he couldn’t market a film that starred people of color.  Avatar: the Last Airbender, a beloved show that featured, and was celebrated for, a multi-racial cast of characters was rereleased as a feature length film with Caucasian actors being cast in all the main roles.  Finally, in recent weeks we’ve got word that Scarlett Johansson has signed on to star in a Hollywood version of Ghost in the Shell; a Japanese Anime/Manga that takes place in Japan, features a group of people who are all Japanese, and has critical political commentary on the United States (they are presented as the American Empire in the story).

Furthermore, you have to consider the fact that when it comes to POC telling their own stories they must be stories that match up to the current stereotypical views of POC; look no further than The Help and 12 Years a Slave. If POC are to tell their own stories they must do so in a way that does not make white people feel uncomfortable, guilty, or upset.

In each of the three examples of movies I’ve mentioned in this post there was a plethora of social commentary as fans of each story listed the various people of color that could have starred in each of the movies.  The critiques also explored why whitewashing was so damaging to the people who enjoyed the source material as well as why representation is so important.

Again, the racism presented in “Far Beyond the Stars” doesn’t manifest so bluntly in our modern times, but it is no less present and no less harmful. Our only notions of a world without violence come from a fictional universe, this is how much work is ahead of us.

Captain Sisko: “What if this, all of this, is the illusion?”

Mr. Sisko: “That’s a scary thought.”

It is the illusion, Captain, and it is a very scary thought Mr. Sisko.